Hamm
Hamm v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 TERRY HAMM, et al., Case No. 5:16-cv-03370-EJD
Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
v.
MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 189 Defendant.
Before the Court is Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (“MBUSA”)’s motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s order denying its motion to strike the expert report of Plaintiffs’ expert, Murat Okcuoglu (“Prior Order”). Mot. for Leave to File Mot. for Recon. (“Mot. for Leave”), ECF No. 189; Mot. for Recon., ECF No. 189-1; Order Den. Mot. to Strike (“Prior Order”), ECF No. 124. MBUSA argues that reconsideration is warranted due to recent modifications to Federal Rule of Evidence 702(d) and the addition of the new Plaintiff, Steven Chan (“Chan”). See Mot. for Leave. For the following reasons, the Court DENIES MBUSA’s motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration. I. BACKGROUND …