Hamm
Hamm v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 26, 20245:16-cv-03370California6,319 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 TERRY HAMM, et al., Case No. 5:16-cv-03370-EJD
Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART MOTION TO
v. DISMISS; GRANTING MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGEMENT; DENYING
MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, MOTION FOR CLASS
CERTIFICATION
Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 182, 183, 184
Plaintiff Terry Hamm (“Hamm”) individually and Plaintiff Steven Chan (“Chan”) individually and on behalf of a putative class (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this suit under the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act, Cal. Civ. Code §1750 et. seq. (“CLRA”) alleging that Defendant, Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (“MBUSA”), knew of and actively concealed defects in vehicle transmission systems. Fourth Am. Compl. (“FAC”), ECF No. 180. Before the Court are (1) MBUSA’s motion to dismiss, (2) MBUSA’s motion for summary judgment, and (3) Plaintiffs’ motion for class…