Hamm

Hamm v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 26, 20245:16-cv-03370California6,319 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 TERRY HAMM, et al., Case No. 5:16-cv-03370-EJD

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

v. DISMISS; GRANTING MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGEMENT; DENYING

MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, MOTION FOR CLASS

CERTIFICATION

Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 182, 183, 184

Plaintiff Terry Hamm (“Hamm”) individually and Plaintiff Steven Chan (“Chan”) individually and on behalf of a putative class (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this suit under the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act, Cal. Civ. Code §1750 et. seq. (“CLRA”) alleging that Defendant, Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (“MBUSA”), knew of and actively concealed defects in vehicle transmission systems. Fourth Am. Compl. (“FAC”), ECF No. 180. Before the Court are (1) MBUSA’s motion to dismiss, (2) MBUSA’s motion for summary judgment, and (3) Plaintiffs’ motion for class…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.