Filho

Filho v. Mercy Housing California XVII, LP

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 27, 20243:24-cv-03316California3,324 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERTO FILHO,

Case No. 24-cv-03316-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

MERCY HOUSING CALIFORNIA XVII, UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915 AS TO

LP, DEFENDANT TISCARENO Defendant.

12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Robert Filho, pro se, applied to proceed in forma pauperis and the Court granted his application. See Docket No. 7. The Court now reviews the sufficiency of Plaintiff’s complaint to determine whether it satisfies 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Because the complaint does not appear to state a claim as to Defendant Tiscareno, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the complaint should not be dismissed as to that defendant. Plaintiff may file either an amended complaint or a response to this order addressing why his complaint is sufficient as to Defendant Tiscareno, no later than July 26, 2024. II. ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.