Tibbs
Tibbs v. Arlo Technologies, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 CASEY TIBBS, ANDREW CASTILLO, Case No. 23-cv-05096-EJD and ERIC WILIM, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION
Plaintiffs, TO STRIKE
v. 11 Re: ECF Nos. 29, 45 ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant.
14 Plaintiffs Casey Tibbs, Andrew Castillo, and Eric Wilim (together, “Plaintiffs”) bring this 15 putative class action against Defendant Arlo Technologies, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Arlo”) for 16 alleged violations of Illinois’s Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA”), 740 Ill. Comp. Stat. 17 (“ILCS”) 14/1, et seq. (2008). See First Am. Class Action Compl. (“FAC”), ECF No. 28. Now 18 pending before the Court is (1) Defendant’s motion to dismiss the FAC (the “Motion to Dismiss”), 19 see Mot., ECF No. 29, and (2) Plaintiffs’ motion to strike Defendant’s notice of supplemental 20 authority (the “Motion to Strike”), see Strike Mot., ECF No. 45. The Court finds the matter 21 suitable for decision without…