Rowen
Rowen v. Prasifka
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROBERT ROWEN, Case No. 23-cv-02806-DMR
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS
v. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
WILLIAM PRASIFKA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 48 Defendants.
Defendants William Prasifka, Reji Varghese, Jannsen Tan, California Attorney General Rob Bonta, John S. Gatschet, and Caitlin Ross move pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) to dismiss self-represented Plaintiff Robert Jay Rowen’s amended complaint challenging the suspension and eventual revocation of his medical license. [Docket No. 48.] This matter is suitable for resolution without a hearing. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the motion to dismiss is granted. I. REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE Defendants ask the court to take judicial notice of the August 25, 2023 Decision of the Medical Board of California adopting the Proposed Decision in “In the Matter of the Accusation Against: Robert Jay Rowen, M.D., Respondent”…