Davis
Davis v. Inmar, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 CATHERINE “CASSIE” DAVIS, et al., Case No. 3:21-cv-03779-JD
Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT
v. AND TRIAL
INMAR, INC., Defendant.
14 Plaintiffs Catherine “Cassie” Davis and Julia Rhodes worked at YouTech when defendant Inmar, Inc. (Inmar) acquired it in March 2019. Dkt. No. 27 ¶ 17. Inmar terminated their employment in April 2020. Dkt. No. 27 ¶¶ 33, 45. In a first amended complaint, Davis and Rhodes allege claims for gender discrimination, retaliation, wrongful termination, and failure to prevent harassment, discrimination, or retaliation, under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), Cal Gov. Code § 12940, et seq.; discrimination in payment on the basis of sex, with respect to Davis only, Cal. Lab. Code § 1197.5; fraud; and failure to pay wages at time of termination, in violation of Section 201 of the California Labor Code. The parties stipulated to the dismissal of Davis’ claim for denial of equal pay for equal work under the…