de Tagle v. Santa Clara County District Attorney's Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20245:24-cv-03480California316 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 AUSTIN DE TAGLE, Case No. 24-cv-03480-NC Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE v. DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS DUPLICATIVE

SANTA CLARA COUNTY DISTRICT

ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Re: ECF 4 Defendant. Self-represented Plaintiff Austin de Tagle filed a complaint on June 10, 2024. ECF 1. The complaint is the same as one already filed with the Court at docket 5:24-cv-03353- || SVK. “Plaintiffs generally have no right to maintain two separate actions involving the

|| same subject matter at the same time in the same court and against the same defendant.”

|| Mendoza v. Amalgamated Transit Union Int’l, 30 F.4th 879, 886 (9th Cir.) (quotation

|| marks omitted). Having multiple identical cases is not efficient for the parties or the Court

16 || and risks creating…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.