Chang
Chang v. Cashman
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 STACY CHANG, Case No. 22-cv-02010-AMO (DMR)
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
v. TO COMPEL
CARLOS CASHMAN, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 121 Defendants.
The parties filed a joint discovery letter in which Plaintiff Stacy Chang moves to compel Defendants Arrowside Ventures, LLC and Perseverus, LLC to produce communications withheld under the attorney-client privilege. [Docket No. 121.] This matter is suitable for resolution without a hearing. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, Plaintiff’s motion is granted. I. BACKGROUND In this action, Plaintiff sues Defendants Carlos Cashman; Arrowside Capital, LLC; Arrowside Fund GP, LLC; Arrowside Ventures, LLC (“Ventures”); Cashman Family Investment II LLC; and Perserverus LLC (“Perseverus”) for claims related to Defendant Cashman’s alleged recruitment of Plaintiff as a partner at an investment fund and subsequent wrongful termination. At issue…