Chang

Chang v. Cashman

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20243:22-cv-02010California3,051 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 STACY CHANG, Case No. 22-cv-02010-AMO (DMR)

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. TO COMPEL

CARLOS CASHMAN, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 121 Defendants.

The parties filed a joint discovery letter in which Plaintiff Stacy Chang moves to compel Defendants Arrowside Ventures, LLC and Perseverus, LLC to produce communications withheld under the attorney-client privilege. [Docket No. 121.] This matter is suitable for resolution without a hearing. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, Plaintiff’s motion is granted. I. BACKGROUND In this action, Plaintiff sues Defendants Carlos Cashman; Arrowside Capital, LLC; Arrowside Fund GP, LLC; Arrowside Ventures, LLC (“Ventures”); Cashman Family Investment II LLC; and Perserverus LLC (“Perseverus”) for claims related to Defendant Cashman’s alleged recruitment of Plaintiff as a partner at an investment fund and subsequent wrongful termination. At issue…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.