Beijing Meishe Network Technology Co., Ltd. v. TikTok Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 2, 20243:23-cv-06012California519 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BEIJING MEISHE NETWORK Case No. 23-cv-06012-SI

TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.,

8 Plaintiff, ORDER LISTING QUESTIONS FOR THE PARTIES TO ADDRESS AT THE v. JULY 12, 2024 HEARING 10 TIKTOK INC., et al., 11 Defendants. 12 This case is set for a July 12, 2024 hearing on defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint and defendants’ motion to compel plaintiff to identify its trade secrets and stay discovery in the interim. The Court would like the parties to be prepared to address the following questions at the July 12, 2024 hearing. 17 • Is Meishe alleging that each line entry in Ex. O to the Fourth Amended Complaint (“FOAC”) is a trade secret that was misappropriated by defendants? Is Ex. O all of Meishe’s source code? • Is ¶ 150 of the FOAC, starting at “This source code includes . . .” a summary of the source code identified in Exhibit O? • For the TUTSA choice of law dispute, neither party…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.