In re SentinelOne, Inc. Securities Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 2, 20244:23-cv-02786California5,594 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE SENTINELONE, INC.

SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. 23-cv-02786-HSG ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS

9 Re: Dkt. No. 51 This Document Relates to All Actions

12 Pending before the Court is a motion to dismiss Lead Plaintiff’s putative securities class action filed against Defendants SentinelOne, Tomer Weingarten, and David Bernhardt (“Defendants”). Dkt. No. 51. For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. I. BACKGROUND SentinelOne is a cybersecurity company that offers its products via subscription contracts, generally on terms of one to three years. Amended Complaint (“AC”) ¶ 3. The company recognizes revenue ratably over the course of a contract in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). Id. It also tracks three non-GAAP “key business metrics,” including Annualized Recurring Revenue (“ARR”). Id. During the Class Period, Defendants defined ARR as “the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.