Harry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BRIGHT HARRY, et al., Case No. 24-cv-00484-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

v. REMAND AND GRANTING IN PART

AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

WEDBUSH SECURITIES INC., et al., DISMISS Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 12, 18, 19, 28, 30,

12 Pending before the Court are several motions to remand filed by Plaintiffs, Dkt. Nos. 12, 19, 28, 30, 48, and a motion to dismiss filed by Defendants, Dkt. No. 18. The Court finds these matters appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matters are deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion to remand and GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND This is the fourth case that Plaintiffs Bright Harry and Ronald S. Draper have filed against Defendants in the last ten years. The parties are familiar with this…