Fan

Fan v. NBA Properties Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 2, 20243:23-cv-05069California973 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 THOMAS FAN, Case No. 23-cv-05069-SI

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT NBA

PROPERTIES’ MOTION TO DISMISS

v. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

AND GRANTING MOTIONS TO FILE

NBA PROPERTIES INC., et al., UNDER SEAL Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 59, 60, 61, 66,

12 Now before the Court is defendant NBA Properties Inc.’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s 13 second amended complaint. Dkt. No. 59. The Court determined that this matter was suitable for 14 resolution without oral argument and VACATED the hearing on this matter pursuant to Civil Local 15 Rule 7-1(b). For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion is DENIED. In addition, the Court 16 GRANTS the parties’ administrative motions to seal. 17 Plaintiff Thomas Fan brings this putative class action against NBA Properties, Inc. (“NBA 18 Properties”), and Dapper Labs, Inc. (“Dapper”), asserting claims under the Video Privacy Protection 19 Act (“VPPA”), 18 U.S.C. § 2710, and California Civil Code §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.