Epic Games, Inc. v. Google LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 3, 20243:20-cv-05671California11,216 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IN RE GOOGLE PLAY STORE MDL Case No. 21-md-02981-JD

ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Member Case No. 20-cv-05671-JD

ORDER RE GOOGLE’S RENEWED

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS

MATTER OF LAW OR FOR NEW

TRIAL IN EPIC CASE

12 After 15 days of trial, a jury found in favor of plaintiff Epic Games Inc. on its antitrust claims against Google. See Dkt. No. 866. Google had moved for judgment as a matter of law at an appropriate stage of the trial, which the Court denied. Dkt. Nos. 825, 831. Google renewed the motion post-verdict under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b), with a motion in the alternative for a new trial under Rule 59. Dkt. No. 925. The Court denied both motions. Dkt. No. 951. This order provides a detailed explanation for that decision. BACKGROUND The Court presented the background of this multidistrict antitrust litigation in other orders. See, e.g., Dkt. Nos. 383, 588. In pertinent part,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.