Laatz

Laatz v. Zazzle, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 3, 20245:22-cv-04844California2,670 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 NICKY LAATZ, Case No. 22-cv-04844-BLF (VKD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE PENDING DISCOVERY

v. DISPUTES

ZAZZLE, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 192, 202, 205, 206, 207, 212 Defendants.

13 The Court held a discovery status conference on July 2, 2024 during which the parties and the Court discussed several pending discovery disputes and other discovery-related matters. See Dkt. No. 213. Based on the discussion during the conference, the Court orders as follows: 1. Dkt. No. 202 (Ms. Laatz’s Interrogatories Nos. 5-12, 14) Zazzle must serve amended responses to Interrogatories 5, 10-12, and 14. Zazzle must serve an amended response to Interrogatory No. 8 that states the number of persons who published at least one design on Zazzle’s website during the time the disputed font1 was being offered for use in Zazzle’s design tool. Zazzle must serve an amended response to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.