Scott

Scott v. Cintas Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 3, 20243:23-cv-05764California5,466 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ISAIAH SCOTT, Case No. 3:23-cv-05764-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION

v. TO DISMISS

CINTAS CORPORATION, Re: Dkt. No. 35 Defendant.

12 Isaiah Scott, a former Management Trainee at Cintas Corporation (“Cintas”), alleges Cintas violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) as well as several California Labor Code provisions. (Dkt. No. 34.) The Court previously granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint with leave to amend. Now pending before the Court is Cintas’s motion to dismiss the Third Amended Complaint under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Having carefully considered the briefing, the Court concludes oral argument is not required, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), and DENIES Cintas’s motion to dismiss as to all claims except for Scott’s claim under California’s Unfair Competition Law. Scott has plausibly pled violations of the FLSA and California Labor Code. However,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.