Laatz

Laatz v. Zazzle, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20245:22-cv-04844California1,821 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 NICKY LAATZ, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04844-BLF

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART SEALING

MOTION

ZAZZLE, INC., et al., [Re: ECF No. 186] Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Nicky Laatz’s administrative motion to consider whether another party’s materials should be sealed in connection with her motion for relief from the scheduling order. See ECF No. 186. Defendants have filed a statement in support of sealing certain exhibits identified in Laatz’s motion and requesting that certain documents, which were filed publicly, be sealed. See ECF No. 195. Laatz filed an opposition to Defendants’ statement. See ECF No. 201. The Court has reviewed the motion, statement, and opposition, and for the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the sealing motion. I. LEGAL STANDARD “Historically, courts have recognized a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.