Faizi

Faizi v. Temori

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20245:22-cv-04224California2,076 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 AHMAD MUKHTAR FAIZI, an individual Case No. 22-cv-04224-VKD and derivatively on behalf of FALAFEL FLAME, INC.,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

Plaintiff, DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S

RENEWED MOTION FOR DEFAULT

v. JUDGMENT

BAKTASH TEMORI, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 113 Defendants. 13 I. BACKGROUND Mr. Faizi previously moved for default judgment, on behalf of Falafel Flame, Inc. (“Falafel Flame” or “Company”), against defendants Falafel Flame Hayward, Falafel Flame Sunnyvale, and Falafel Flame San Jose. See Dkt. No. 95. The motion concerned only the complaint’s first claim for relief for trademark infringement under the Lanham Act. Id. On March 21, 2024, the Court granted the motion in part and denied it in part. Dkt. No. 107. The Court found that Falafel Flame is entitled to default judgment regarding liability on the Lanham Act claim for trademark infringement. Id. at 4-7. However,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.