Hultman
Hultman v. Mattson
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHARLENE HULTMAN, Case No. 24-cv-03381-JST
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION
KENNETH W. MATTSON, et al., Re: ECF No. 19 Defendants.
12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Charlene Hultman’s motion for a preliminary injunction. ECF No. 19. The Court finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Civil L.R. 7-1(b), and will deny the motion. I. BACKGROUND Charlene Hultman, a 79-year-old widow, alleges that Defendant Kenneth W. Mattson, acting on behalf of Defendant LeFever Mattson, Inc. (“LM”), fraudulently persuaded her and her late husband to invest in two real estate investments: (1) $380,000 in Defendant Divi Divi Tree, LP (“Divi”), of which she alleges LM is the general partner, in 2011; and (2) $420,000 in Defendant Specialty Properties Partners, LP, of which she alleges Defendant KS Mattson Partners, LP, is the general partner, in 2013. She…