Hultman

Hultman v. Mattson

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20244:24-cv-03381California1,494 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHARLENE HULTMAN, Case No. 24-cv-03381-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION

KENNETH W. MATTSON, et al., Re: ECF No. 19 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Charlene Hultman’s motion for a preliminary injunction. ECF No. 19. The Court finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Civil L.R. 7-1(b), and will deny the motion. I. BACKGROUND Charlene Hultman, a 79-year-old widow, alleges that Defendant Kenneth W. Mattson, acting on behalf of Defendant LeFever Mattson, Inc. (“LM”), fraudulently persuaded her and her late husband to invest in two real estate investments: (1) $380,000 in Defendant Divi Divi Tree, LP (“Divi”), of which she alleges LM is the general partner, in 2011; and (2) $420,000 in Defendant Specialty Properties Partners, LP, of which she alleges Defendant KS Mattson Partners, LP, is the general partner, in 2013. She…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.