Becerra-Zamora

Becerra-Zamora v. Gruma Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20243:24-cv-01076California3,578 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

` 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 YESICA BECERRA-ZAMORA, Case No. 24-cv-01076-WHO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. REMAND; DENYING MOTION TO

CONSOLIDATE; DEFERRING

GRUMA CORPORATION, et al., MOTION TO COMPEL Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 11, 15,

12 Plaintiff Yesica Becerra-Zamora (“Becerra”) moves to remand this PAGA action to state court. Because defendants have failed to show that more than $75,000 is in controversy, the motion to remand is GRANTED. Defendants’ motion to consolidate this case to the lower- numbered voluntary dismissed case is DENIED and their motion to compel arbitration is deferred for decision by the state court on remand. BACKGROUND Becerra previously filed Zamora v. Gruma Corporation, et. al, Case No. 3:23-cv-05256- LB (“Becerra I”), a putative wage and hour class action against the same defendants in Becerra II, in state court in August 2023. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.