Cornejo

Cornejo v. Minglana

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 9, 20244:23-cv-05383California453 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EFRAIN CORNEJO, Case No. 23-cv-05383-JSW

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

VACATE SETTLEMENT

v. PROCEEDINGS; DENYING MOTION

TO DISMISS; LIFTING STAY;

SERGEANT V. MINGLANA, et al., SCHEDULING MOTION BRIEFING Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 16,

Good cause appearing, Defendants’ motion to vacate the settlement proceedings is GRANTED. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is DENIED without prejudice because it violates the stay. (See ECF No. 9.) The stay is now lifted. Defendants may re-file their motion to dismiss according to the schedule below, and the case may be referred back for settlement following resolution of such a motion. 1. No later than August 24, 2024, Defendants shall file a motion to dismiss or other dispositive motion. 2. Plaintiff's opposition to the dispositive motion, if any, shall be filed with the court and served upon defendanst no later than September 9, 2024. 21…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.