Goins

Goins v. United Parcel Service Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20244:21-cv-08722California18,002 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GALENA GOINS, et al., Case No. 21-cv-08722-PJH Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC, Re: Dkt. No. 66 Defendant.

13 Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc.’s (“UPS”) motion for summary judgment and plaintiffs’ Rule 56(d) motion came on for hearing before this court on May 23, 2024. Plaintiffs appeared through their counsel, Tiega Varlack. Defendant appeared through its counsel, Elizabeth Brown. Having read the papers filed by the parties and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS UPS’s motion for summary judgment and DENIES plaintiffs’ Rule 56(d) motion, for the following reasons. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Plaintiffs are three female employees of defendant United Parcel Service, Inc., a global transportation and logistics company. Plaintiffs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.