Ramachandran

Ramachandran v. City of Los Altos

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 9, 20245:23-cv-02928California6,537 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SATISH RAMACHANDRAN, Case No. 23-cv-02928-SVK

Plaintiff, FURTHER ORDER ON DEFENDANT

CITY OF LOS ALTOS’ MOTION FOR

v. SANCTIONS

CITY OF LOS ALTOS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 57 Defendants.

Plaintiff Satish Ramachandran, proceeding pro se, has owned a residential property in the City of Los Altos since 1993. Dkt. 40 (First Amended Complaint or “FAC”) ¶ 1. Plaintiff sought to renovate his home in 2013, was denied permits by the City of Los Altos, was cited for violations of the Los Altos Municipal Code following the City’s inspection of his property in 2018, and asserts he was harmed through a deprivation of constitutional rights and a conspiracy between the City, certain former employees of the City, and his neighbor Pamela Jacobs. See generally FAC. Mr. Ramachandran was embroiled in litigation and other proceedings involving Ms. Jacobs and the City for approximately six years before he filed this action. The …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.