Sanai

Sanai v. Cardona

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 9, 20244:22-cv-01818California558 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CYRUS SANAI, Case No. 22-cv-01818-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING AMENDED

v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

GEORGE CARDONA, et al., Re: ECF Nos. 122, 123 Defendants.

12 On July 2, 2024, Plaintiff Cyrus Sanai filed a motion for a temporary restraining order and an order to show cause re: preliminary injunction. ECF No. 119. He sought to enjoin the State Bar from commencing disciplinary proceedings against him on a date when he is simultaneously required to defend an unlawful detainer proceeding in Los Angeles Superior Court. Id. at 24–25. On July 3, 2024, the Court denied the motion. ECF No. 121. Reasoning that Younger abstention applies, the Court concluded that Sanai could raise his arguments regarding his state proceedings on appeal or by writ, in the appropriate state forum. Id. at 2 (citing Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971)). Sanai subsequently filed a motion for leave to file a motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.