LIIKALA

LIIKALA v. BROOKALE SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITIES, INC.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 10, 20245:23-cv-03612California3,054 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANASTASIA LIIKALA, Case No. 23-cv-03612-PCP

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

BROOKALE SENIOR LIVING Re: Dkt. No. 26 COMMUNITIES, INC., et al., 11 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Anastasia Liikala alleges that her former employers Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. and Brookdale Senior Living Communities, Inc. (collectively, “Brookdale”) violated her rights under California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) by unlawfully terminating her for taking medical leave, and that Brookdale’s agent Sedgwick Claims Management, Inc. participated in the violation of those rights. Defendant Sedgwick now moves to dismiss the case on statute of limitations grounds under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons that follow, Sedgwick’s motion is denied. BACKGROUND Liikala was employed by Brookdale as a full-time receptionist at an assisted living facility.1 She alleges that she gave notice…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.