Cornejo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EFRAIN CORNEJO, Case No. 23-cv-05383-JSW Plaintiff, AMENDED ORDER GRANTING

MOTION TO VACATE

v. SETTLEMENT PROCEEDINGS;

DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS;

SERGEANT V. MINGLANA, et al., LIFTING STAY; SCHEDULING

MOTION BRIEFING

Defendants. 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 16, 17 Good cause appearing, Defendants’ motion to vacate the settlement proceedings is GRANTED. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is DENIED without prejudice because it violates the stay. (See ECF No. 9.) The stay is now lifted. Defendants may re-file their motion to dismiss according to the schedule below, and the case may be referred back for settlement following resolution of such a motion. 1. No later than August 5, 2024, Defendants shall file a motion to dismiss or other dispositive motion. 2. Plaintiff's opposition to the dispositive motion, if any, shall be filed with the court and served upon defendanst no later than September 9, 2024. 3.…