In Re Meta Pixel Healthcare Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 10, 20243:22-cv-03580California4,826 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IN RE META PIXEL HEALTHCARE Case No. 22-cv-03580-WHO (VKD)

LITIGATION

REDACTED

This Document Relates To: ORDER RE MAY 8, 2024 DISCOVERY

DISPUTE RE PRIVILEGE CLAIMS

All Actions Re: Dkt. Nos. 428, 457, 475, 476

12 The parties ask the Court to resolve their remaining disputes concerning defendant Meta’s privilege claims. See Dkt. No. 476-3. Plaintiffs ask the Court to order Meta to produce all documents in unredacted form, or in the alternative, to submit all documents to the Court for in camera review. Id. at 1; Dkt. No. 428 at 3-4; Dkt. No. 457 at 2. Meta objects to producing documents that it says are protected from disclosure, in whole or in part, and to this Court conducting an in camera review. Dkt. No. 476-3 at 4; Dkt. No. 428 at 7; Dkt. No. 457 at 2. The Court finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons explained below, the Court denies plaintiffs’ request for an order requiring…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.