Sivak

Sivak v. Thompson

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 11, 20243:24-cv-01208California787 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 LACEY SIVAK, Case Nos. 24-cv-00631-AMO (PR) Petitioner, 24-cv-00932-AMO (PR) 9 24-cv-01039-AMO (PR) v. 24-cv-01056-AMO (PR)

JUDGE TRINA L. THOMPSON, et al., 24-cv-01207-AMO (PR) Respondents. 24-cv-01208-AMO (PR) 12 24-cv-01209-AMO (PR)

24-cv-01210-AMO (PR) 24-cv-02059-AMO (PR) 24-cv-02944-AMO (PR) 15 24-cv-02945-AMO (PR)

23-cv-06251-AMO (PR)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

19 Lacey Sivak, an Idaho state prisoner and frequent litigant, filed the above-captioned 20 actions, representing himself. In each case, the Court denied Sivak’s motion for leave to proceed 21 in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)1 because he has had three or more prior 22 dismissals, has failed to allege any specific imminent danger of serious physical injury at the time 23 he filed the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.