McGee

McGee v. Palo Alto Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 10, 20245:22-cv-09094California1,573 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 ANTHONY MCGEE, Case No. 22-cv-09094-NC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS FOR v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF JOY, et al., CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(b) 14 Defendants.

On July 10, 2024, Plaintiff Anthony McGee failed to attend a third consecutive case management conference in this matter. McGee alleges the Defendants, two Palo Alto police officers, violated his constitutional rights. Despite numerous prompts by the Court and warnings of potential consequences, McGee has not appeared or otherwise participated in this matter since January 31, 2024. At the July 10 conference, Defendants orally moved for involuntary dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 for failure to prosecute. Because McGee’s complete nonparticipation has halted all progress in this matter, the Court grants the motion and DISMISSES McGee’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.