Kamath

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RESHMA KAMATH, Case No. 23-cv-05153-SVK

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND

ITRIA VENTURES, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 34 Defendants.

The Court previously dismissed self-represented Plaintiff Reshma Kamath’s complaint and provided instructions on how she could cure the deficiencies identified in an amended pleading. See Dkt. 22 (the “Prior Order”). Plaintiff evidently did not heed the Court’s instruction—her first amended complaint (the “FAC” at Dkt. 27) suffers from many of the same issues that compelled dismissal the first time around. She also added one new claim in the FAC, but that claim suffers from pleading defects as well (and, in any event, Plaintiff has abandoned it). Defendants now move to dismiss. See Dkt. 34 (the “Motion”). Plaintiff opposes the Motion. See Dkt. 39 (the “Opposition”). Defendants filed a reply. See Dkt. 40. All necessary Parties—Plaintiff and named …