Stanley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 RODRIC P. STANLEY, Case No. 22-cv-04198-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. 6 Re: Dkt. No. 33 JUDI CRANMER, et al., Defendants.

9 Plaintiff, a detainee, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 24, 2023, the Court granted defendants’ motion to compel plaintiff to appear for a deposition and to respond to written discovery requests. On December 11, 2023, defendants filed a motion for sanctions over plaintiff’s failure to respond to the written discovery requests. Plaintiff had not responded to the motion for sanctions or otherwise communicated with the Court. On January 25, 2024, plaintiff was ordered to respond to the motion within twenty-one days. Plaintiff had still not filed an opposition or otherwise communicated with the Court, so he was afforded a final opportunity to file a response to the motion for sanctions by March 14, 2024. He was informed that no further extensions would be granted, and a failure to meet this deadline will result in claim or…