Flodin

Flodin v. Central Garden & Pet Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 11, 20244:21-cv-01631California4,079 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOHN FLODIN, et al., Case No. 21-cv-01631-JST (DMR)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER ON JOINT DISCOVERY

v. LETTER

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY, Re: Dkt. No. 170 et al., 11 Defendants. 12 The parties filed a joint discovery letter (“JDL”) in which Plaintiffs John Flodin and Aaron Brand (“Plaintiffs”) seek to compel Defendants Central Garden & Pet Co. (“Central”) and Breeder’s Choice Pet Foods, Inc. (“Breeder”) to re-offer a 30(b)(6) witness, and also seek an order limiting defense counsel’s objections in future depositions. [Docket No. 170 (JDL).] This matter is suitable for determination without oral argument. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ motion is granted in part and denied in part. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs allege that Defendants’ product labeling falsely represents that their “AvoDerm” pet food products included avocado as an ingredient and that the avocado was sourced from California, when in fact 1) the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.