Ha
Ha v. Barclays Bank Delaware
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 SALLY HA, Case No. 24-cv-00668-BLF
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
v. DISMISS WITHOUT LEAVE TO
AMEND
BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE, [Re: ECF No. 8] Defendant.
12 Pro se Plaintiff Sally Ha’s First Amended Complaint alleges one claim for breach of contract against Defendant Barclays Bank Delaware (“Barclays”). ECF No. 5 (“FAC”). Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, ECF No. 8 (“Mot.”), ECF No. 17 (“Reply”), which Plaintiff opposes. ECF No. 16 (“Opp.”). The Court finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons described below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff alleges that she opened a credit card account with Barclays in June 2016. FAC ¶ 8. Plaintiff alleges that in accordance with the attached cardmember agreement, Plaintiff became a “private…