Purcell
Purcell v. Chubb Ltd.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 GILBERT PURCELL, Case No. 3:23-cv-04927-JD
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE DISMISSAL
v.
FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.
Plaintiff Gilbert Purcell on behalf of himself and putative national and California classes, has sued defendants Federal Insurance Company (Federal), Chubb Group Holdings, and Chubb INA Holdings, over homeowners insurance premiums. The case was originally filed in the District of New Jersey, Dkt. No. 1, and transferred to this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404. Dkt. No. 48. The parties jointly stipulated to dismissal without prejudice of the Chubb defendants. Dkt. No. 129. Federal remains as the sole defendant. The Court dismissed the claims of unjust enrichment and violation of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act (NJCFA) in the prior complaint, and denied dismissal of the breach of contract and California Unfair Competition Law (UCL) claims. Dkt. No. 101. Purcell filed a second amended complaint (SAC). Dkt. No. 109. Federal asks to dismiss…