Sayce

Sayce v. Forescout Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 11, 20243:20-cv-00076California646 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHRISTOPHER L. SAYCE, et al., Case No. 20-cv-00076-SI

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE JUNE 26, 2024 JOINT

v. DISCOVERY DISPUTE

FORESCOUT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et Re: Dkt. No. 228 al., 11 Defendants. 12 On June 26, 2024 the Court received a joint discovery dispute statement regarding the number of depositions plaintiffs are entitled to take. Dkt. No. 228. Plaintiffs request leave to take twenty depositions in this case. To date, plaintiffs have taken four depositions with a fifth scheduled this month. Id. at 2. Plaintiffs contend that after the Court’s February 13, 2024 discovery order, plaintiffs received more than 50,000 documents and “know with certainty that more than a dozen individuals possess adverse information that corroborates the claims,” warranting twenty depositions. Id. at 1. The targeted deponents are “senior sales personnel with significant managerial responsibility, senior finance personnel, and key individuals involved in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.