Enovsys LLC v. Lyft, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 12, 20245:23-cv-05157California1,372 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ENOVSYS LLC, Case No. 23-cv-05157-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING IN PART AND

DEFERRING IN PART MOTION FOR

v. LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

LYFT, INC., Re: ECF No. 49 Defendant.

The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff Enovsys LLC’s Motion for Leave to File a Motion for Partial Reconsideration of the Court’s June 17, 2024, Order pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-9. Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF No. 49. Having read and considered Enovsys’s Motion, the Court DENIES IN PART AND DEFERS IN PART Enovsys’s Motion and requests a limited response from Defendant Lyft, Inc. (“Lyft”) as stated below. I. BACKGROUND Enovsys brought this action against Lyft alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,441,752 (“’752 patent”); 6,756,918 (“’918 patent”); and 7,199,726 (“’726 patent”) (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”). On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.