Rankins
Rankins v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TAMI RANKINS, Case No.23-cv-05785-JSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION
v. TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 54 Defendant.
12 Tami Rankins sues United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”) for the Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (“IIED”) under California law. (Dkt. No. 45.) Now pending before the Court is UPS’s motion to dismiss Ms. Rankins’ IIED claim as barred by the statute of limitations. (Dkt. No. 47.) Having carefully considering the parties’ written submissions, and having had the benefit of oral argument on June 27, 2024, the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion. Ms. Rankins has sufficiently stated an IIED claim, and drawing all reasonable inferences from the allegations in Ms. Rankins’ favor, UPS has not established the claim is barred by the statute of limitations as a matter of law. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT…