Pearl

Pearl v. Coinbase Global, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 15, 20243:22-cv-03561California5,469 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 LARRY PEARL, et al., Case No. 22-cv-03561-MMC

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS'

MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION TO

STRIKE

COINBASE GLOBAL, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Before the Court are defendants’ Coinbase, Inc. (“Coinbase”) and Coinbase Global, Inc.’s (“Coinbase Global”) motion, filed May 9, 2024, “to Dismiss the Second Amended Class Action Complaint” and motion “to Strike Class Allegations,” filed concurrently therewith. On June 10, 2024, plaintiff Larry Pearl (“Pearl”) filed opposition to both motions, to which defendants, on June 24, 2024, replied. Having read and considered the papers respective written submissions, the Court hereby rules as follows.1 BACKGROUND2 Coinbase is “an online marketplace that operates . . . digital asset exchanges” for cryptocurrencies. (See SAC ¶ 36.) One cryptocurrency traded on the platform is …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.