Langham

Langham v. Granzella

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 15, 20244:23-cv-02275California797 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MALIK LANGHAM, Case No. 23-cv-02275-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS

v. Re: Dkt. No. 32 ANTONIO GRANZELLA, et al., Defendants.

12 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 32. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the motion. Plaintiff Malik Langham initially filed this action in May 2023 against several California Highway Patrol Officers—Defendants Antonio Granzella, Joseph Dagnino, Sean Butler, and Kenton Dewald. Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiff amended his complaint, alleging that he was stopped by California Highway Patrol Officers while driving on the freeway. See Dkt. No. 20 (“FAC”). Plaintiff alleged that during the traffic stop he presented the officers with a valid Florida driver’s license, but he was nevertheless ticketed and handcuffed,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.