Tyson
Tyson v. ACRT Services Incorporated
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 RYAN TYSON, Case No. 23-cv-01889-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
v.
ACRT SERVICES INCORPORATED, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 On January 5, 2024, the Court granted several motions to dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint filed by Defendants ACRT Services Incorporated, Michael Weidner, Cliff Benedict, Shannon Cecconi, Annissa Grider, Travelers Indemnity Company, New York Life Group Benefit Solutions, and Great Banc (collectively, “Defendants”). See Dkt. No. 84. The Court granted Plaintiff leave to amend his complaint by February 2, 2024, and warned him that failure to file an amended complaint by the deadline could result in dismissal of the action in its entirety. See id. at 13. Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint. On February 22, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See Dkt. No. 86. Plaintiff failed respond. Defendants then…