Jackson v. LinkedIn Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 JACQUELINE JACKSON, Case No. 24-cv-00812-PCP (VKD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE RE

v. PROTECTIVE ORDER

LINKEDIN CORPORATION, Re: Dkt. No. 47 Defendant.

13 Plaintiff Jacqueline Jackson and defendant LinkedIn Corporation (“LinkedIn”) ask the Court to resolve a dispute regarding the circumstances under which material designated “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” under their proposed protective order may be disclosed to an expert. Dkt. No. 47. The Court finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). The parties have agreed to request entry of a two-tier protective order that provides for the exchange of discovery material designated “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” (“HC-AEO”). Dkt. No. 47 at 1; Dkt. Nos. 47-1, 47-2. They disagree on one point: whether a receiving party who wishes to share a…