Doe

Doe v. City of Ukiah

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 16, 20243:23-cv-00908California1,132 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JANE DOE, Case No. 23-cv-00908-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

DISMISS

CITY OF UKIAH, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 44 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Jane Doe brings a lawsuit against the City of Ukiah (“City”), Ukiah Police Department, and Ukiah Police Chief Noble Waidelich, alleging that Waidelich sexually assaulted her in her home and that the City is responsible for its negligent supervision of Waidelich. Before the Court is Defendant City’s motion to dismiss the second and third causes of action from Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). ECF 44. The Court assumes familiarity with the facts of the case, the parties’ arguments, and the relevant law. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the motion to dismiss for the following reasons. “To state a claim under [Section] 1983, a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.