Casillas
Casillas v. Bayer Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BEN CASILLAS, et al., Case No. 23-cv-01609-AMO
Plaintiffs,
DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING
v. ORDER
BAYER CORPORATION, Re: Dkt. Nos. 65, 66, 67 Defendant.
12 Before the Court are several motions seeking changes to the case schedule and a discovery letter brief. The matters are fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, any hearings set by the parties associated with these motions are hereby VACATED. See Civil L.R. 7-6. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby rules as follows. I. MOTIONS SEEKING RELIEF FROM SCHEDULING ORDER Two of the parties’ pending motions seek relief from the Court’s scheduling order on separate bases. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(4) requires “good cause” and “the judge’s consent” to modify a scheduling order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). …