Flores

Smith v. Flores

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 16, 20243:23-cv-00132California1,117 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JEFFERY THOMAS SMITH, Case No. 23-cv-00132-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

JACQUELINE FLORES, et al., Defendants.

12 On March 4, 2024, the Court dismissed pro se Plaintiff Jeffery Thomas Smith’s complaint with leave to amend by April 3, 2024. ECF 32. On March 27, 2024, Smith filed a notice of appeal to the Ninth Circuit. ECF 35. The Ninth Circuit dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction on April 29, 2024, and issued the mandate on May 21, 2024. ECF 38, 39. On June 5, 2024, because Smith had not filed an amended complaint, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF 40. The Court directed Smith to file a response by June 26, 2024, or the Court would dismiss the case with prejudice. ECF 40. As of the date of this order, Smith has not filed a written response to the order to show cause or filed an amended complaint. Pursuant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.