Driskill

Driskill v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 17, 20243:24-cv-00583California2,001 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TRAVIS DRISKILL, Case No. 24-cv-00583-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT

v. AFFIRM INC.’S MOTIONS TO

DISMISS AND TO STAY DISCOVERY

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 20, 32, 38 11 Defendants.

12 This is a Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FRCA”) case. Before the Court is Defendant Affirm, Inc.’s (“Affirm”) motion to dismiss (ECF 20) and its motion to stay discovery pending resolution of the motion to dismiss (ECF 32). The matters are fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for August 1, 2024, is VACATED. See Civil L.R. 7- 6. The Court DENIES as moot Driskill and Affirms’ joint motion for leave to appear virtually at the hearing. ECF 38. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby DENIES the motions, for the following reasons. I. BACKGROUND1 22…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.