Tevra Brands LLC v. Bayer HealthCare LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 17, 20245:19-cv-04312California4,469 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 TEVRA BRANDS LLC, Case No. 19-cv-04312-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS IN

v. LIMINE

BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC, et al., [Re: ECF Nos. 368, 370, 371, 372, 373, Defendants. 374]

12 On June 13, 2024, the Court held a pretrial conference in this action, during which it issued oral rulings on Plaintiff Tevra Brands LLC.’s (“Tevra”) and Defendant Bayer Healthcare LLC.’s (“Bayer”) motions in limine. ECF No. 407 (“Hearing Tr.”). The Court here expands upon those oral rulings. I. BACKGROUND Tevra brings this antitrust action against Bayer alleging it engaged in exclusionary practices that substantially restrained trade in the market for topical imidacloprid flea and tick treatments for dogs and cats. Tevra’s Second Amended Complaint alleges three claims: violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act (exclusive dealing and maintenance of a monopoly) and …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.