Valentine

Valentine v. Torres-Quezada

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 17, 20244:22-cv-01520California2,329 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JAVONTAE VALENTINE, Case No. 22-cv-01520-JSW

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND

v. DENYING IN PART, DAUBERT

MOTIONS

TORRES-QUEZADA, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 58-59, 61, 64 Defendants.

12 Now before the Court for consideration are: (1) Plaintiff’s motion to exclude the expert testimony of Scott DeFoe (“DeFoe”); (2) Plaintiff’s motion to exclude the expert testimony of Dave Miles Atkin, M.D. (“Dr. Atkin”); (3) Defendants’ motion to exclude the expert testimony of Williams Adams (“Adams”); and (4) Defendants’ motion to exclude the expert testimony of William Weber, M.D. (“Dr. Weber”). The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case. The Court sets forth its rulings below. BACKGROUND On March 10, 2022, Plaintiff Javontae Valentine (“Valentine”), an inmate at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”), filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983 against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.