McNeff
McNeff v. The City of Pleasanton
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PETER McNEFF, Case No. 23-cv-00106-AMO
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH
PLEASANTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, PREJUDICE et al., Re: Dkt. No. 48 Defendants.
12 This is a Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case in which a police officer alleges that he faced retaliatory employment actions in response to his off-duty attendance at a political event. Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for May 30, 2024, was vacated. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants’ motion, for the following reasons. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background1 Plaintiff…