B.M.
B.M. v. Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 5 J.M., as the Representative of the Estate of Case No. 20-cv-00656-BLF Decedent B.M., ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S Plaintiff, UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT; AND v. VACATING NOVEMBER 25, 2025 HEARING
WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.,
[Re: ECF 160] Defendant. 11 The Court finds Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for leave to amend the complaint to be suitable for decision without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). The November 25, 2024 hearing is VACATED. The motion for leave to amend is GRANTED as discussed below. In January 2020, sex trafficking victim B.M. filed this action against several hotels under the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (“TVPRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 1589 et seq., on the theory that the defendant hotels knowingly benefitted from sex…