Adamik
Adamik v. San Joaquin County Sheriff Deputy Price
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 NICOLE MARIE ADAMIK, Case No. 24-cv-04174-RMI Petitioner,
ORDER OF TRANSFER
v. SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY SHERIFF DEPUTY PRICE, et al., Respondents.
This is a habeas case filed pro se by a prisoner. Petitioner challenges a parole revocation 14 || and ongoing criminal prosecution, both in San Joaquin County. San Joaquin County is in the || venue of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Petitioner is also a 16 || incarcerated in the Eastern District. Venue for a habeas action is proper in either the district of confinement or the district of 18 || conviction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). This district is neither. Petitions challenging a conviction are 19 || preferably heard in the district of conviction. See Habeas L.R. 2254-3(a); see also Laue v. Nelson, 20 || 279 F. Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968). Because Petitioner’s parole was revoked in the Eastern District, and he is being prosecuted and being held in that district,…