Adamik

Adamik v. San Joaquin County Sheriff Deputy Price

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 18, 20241:24-cv-04174California234 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 NICOLE MARIE ADAMIK, Case No. 24-cv-04174-RMI Petitioner,

ORDER OF TRANSFER

v. SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY SHERIFF DEPUTY PRICE, et al., Respondents.

This is a habeas case filed pro se by a prisoner. Petitioner challenges a parole revocation 14 || and ongoing criminal prosecution, both in San Joaquin County. San Joaquin County is in the || venue of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Petitioner is also a 16 || incarcerated in the Eastern District. Venue for a habeas action is proper in either the district of confinement or the district of 18 || conviction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). This district is neither. Petitions challenging a conviction are 19 || preferably heard in the district of conviction. See Habeas L.R. 2254-3(a); see also Laue v. Nelson, 20 || 279 F. Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968). Because Petitioner’s parole was revoked in the Eastern District, and he is being prosecuted and being held in that district,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.