Roe

Roe v. City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 19, 20244:24-cv-01562California4,790 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JANE ROE, et al., Case No. 24-cv-01562-JST

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Re: ECF No. 35 11 Defendant.

12 Before the Court is the City and County of San Francisco’s (“the City”) motion to dismiss. ECF No. 35. The Court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs are residents and businesses in the Tenderloin neighborhood in San Francisco. ECF No. 1 ¶ 6. Plaintiffs allege that the City treats the Tenderloin as a “containment zone” for narcotics activities. Id. Specifically, Plaintiffs contend that “for years the City has allowed individuals to openly buy and use narcotics in the Tenderloin, and to remain, under the obvious influence of drugs, on the sidewalks and public spaces of the neighborhood.” Id. ¶ 8. “Addicts living on the Tenderloin’s streets foreseeably support their habit by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.